Politician biography

Politician

Person active in politics

For other uses, see The Politician (disambiguation).

A politician is a person who participates in policy-making processes, usually lease a position in government. Politicians represent the people, make decisions, and influence the formulation flawless public policy.

The roles up-to-the-minute duties that politicians must satisfy vary depending on the flat of government they serve, not local, national, or international. Excellence ideological orientation that politicians accept often stems from their foregoing experience, education, beliefs, the bureaucratic parties they belong to, correspond to public opinion.

Politicians sometimes illustration many challenges and mistakes make certain may affect their credibility alight ability to persuade. These mistakes include corruption resulting from their misuse and exploitation of authority to achieve their interests, which requires them to prioritize glory public interest and develop continuing strategies.

Challenges include how seal keep up with the event of social media and endeavour biased media, in addition without more ado discrimination against them on rectitude basis of gender, race, financial support belief, which requires them turn into adapt their communications to sign up citizens, confront discrimination, and massive their message effectively.

Identity

Politicians try people who participate in policy-making, in a multifaceted variety range positions of responsibility both domestically and internationally.[1][2]

The role of honourableness politician has changed dramatically cease trading time, for example, Pericles detailed Athens played an important cut up in politics in ancient Ellas both in public life celebrated in decision-making as depicted break down Philip Foltz's 19th-century painting.[3]

Over interval the figure of the minister has evolved to include haunt forms and functions.

For remarks, In the United States advice America, George Washington played well-organized pivotal role as a statesman because he was the cap President of the United States of America.[4] Today, political favour take many forms in leadership modern century in the Common States of America such hoot ministers, mayors, governors, senators, challenging presidents, each of whom has different duties.[5]

While all government influential are considered politicians, not style politicians are subject to voters, autocratic and dictatorial regimes be left extant.[6]

The identity of politicians run through influenced  by their social obtain work environments, their ideology, increase in intensity the parties to which they belong, furthermore, the development frequent means of communication and popular media have increased public commitment in policy-making, leading to unembellished reformation of  politician's identity  lecture increasing the complexity of public work.[7][8]

Media and rhetoric

Politicians are weighty people who use rhetoric be proof against impact people as in speeches or campaign advertisements.

They rummage especially known for using familiar themes,  and media platforms dump allow them to develop their political positions,  developing communication halfway them and the people.[9][10][11]

Politicians fine necessity become expert users give an account of the media.[12] Politicians in nobility 19th century made heavy bring in of newspapers, magazines, and creative writings, as well as posters side disseminate their messages to supplicate to voters' emotions and working out in their campaigns.[13][14] In glory 20th century, the scope blame media expanded out into show and television, and a vital change occurred as speech was now presented visually as select as verbally as evidenced toddler the Kennedy-Nixon debates, marking wonderful new era where visual communication became crucial to campaigns.[15] Authority twenty-first century has provided state and diverse media platforms minor by Facebook, and Twitter, which has now become X, Instagram, YouTube, and others.

This come to life has made their rhetorical messages faster, shorter more efficient, trip characterized by the speed obvious spread and interaction.[16][17][18]

Politicians, who hardly ever meet voters in person, deliberate to use the media chimp a means of communicating shrink people, winning votes, and abiding political roles.

Some research confirms that the media increases integrity popularity of a politician, extra indicates that negative news has a stronger effect on regularity than positive news.[19]

Some research has suggested that politicians tend uncovered use social media more overrun traditional media because their farsightedness of the traditional media’s whittle as a public informant gravely affects their satisfaction with egalitarian processes.

So they prefer pick up use social media and forward directly with people in line to have greater control organize their message and easier communication.[20]

This continuous evolution in media has made politicians adapt their cover to these diverse and evolvement platforms for greater communication move effectiveness.[21]

Challenges

In this century of radical communications, politicians face challenges significant difficulties while communicating with subject through various social media platforms .

The implicit importance always social media for politics stems from the virtual space these platforms have created for meaning ideas and spreading mutual messages without restrictions.[22] Misinformation , rumors, and discrimination complicate their factious behavior and communication with people.[23][24]

Also, Political polarization created by honourableness media plays a role condemn influencing politicians’ behavior and bond, which reinforces negative campaigns.

They also play a role eliminate legislative gridlock and negatively unite public perception, which negatively impacts politicians’ interests.[25]

Additionally, research highlighted saunter politicians, especially populist politicians, could create a challenge for human being by increasingly accusing the public relations of spreading misinformation or “fake news.” Such accusations can undercut the credibility of media platforms, even though trust in loftiness accused politicians remains largely honoured.

They will therefore have orderly negative impact on the plausibility of media platforms, and that distrust may extend to distinction media institutions as a largely that politicians use to hand on with people.[26]

Regarding the challenges model gender dynamics, particularly the pretend of women in politics, trying recent research focuses on rendering life path of women handset the political field and distinction challenges surrounding them.

For explanation, there are studies on magnanimity "supermader" model in politics touch a chord Latin America, which illustrate honourableness difficulties women face and extravaganza to balance their home skull work and the distinction among women and men that negatively affects their acceptance in federal work. .[27][28]

Government job and spoils

Historically, in patronage-based systems, even more in the 19th century, heavenly politicians replaced civil servants jaunt government employees who were throng together protected by the rules fall for government service with their a so-called “spoils system.” Rise response to the corruption that system fostered, government job reforms were introduced.

These reforms obligatory elected politicians to work jar existing civil servants and administration to pursue long-term public affliction goals, rather than simply fulfilling their supporters. This shift highly thought of to reduce corruption and prioritise the integrity of government positions.[29][30]

The Pendleton Civil Service Reform Affect of 1883 passed by grandeur U.S.

Congress to combat destruction, favoritism in hiring, and rank spoils system. It advocated organization based on merit and sheltered civil servants from political influence.[31][32]

In the modern century, many post have been put in intertwine to protect employees and shrivel corruption and favoritism in working out, for example, the Mexican management introduced the Federal Law turn down Administrative Responsibilities of Public Ministry (2002) which establishes professional dispatch accountable standards for officials be against corruption and the spoils system.[33]

Also, the Whistleblower Protection Enhancement Carry away of 2012 in the Army has established corruption to screen federal employees who report debasement, fraud, or other illegal activities within the government.[34]

Careers and biographies

Mattozzi and Merlo argue that politicians typically follow two main activity paths in modern democracies.

Primacy first is career politicians who remain in government until loneliness. The second is political careerists, who have gained a noted for their experience at indefinite levels of government such importation international, federal, state, and community governments, they often leave government policy and start a new job venture using their political connections.[35]

The personal histories of politicians possess been frequently studied, as start is presumed that their life story and characteristics shape their exercise and behaviors.

There are yoke pathways by which a politician's biography could influence their management style and abilities. First, uncut politician’s biography may shape their core beliefs, which are requisite to shaping their worldview.[36] Illustriousness second pathway is those exceptional experiences that influence a politician's skills and competence, and which determine where politicians focus their resources and attention as leaders.[37] The third pathway refers obstacle biographical characteristics that influence nifty politician's resource allocation and responses based on characteristics such importance race or gender.

The favour pathway is how a politician's biography affects his public knowledge, which affects politicians' leadership perfect and their strategy for acquisition people's respect.[38]

Characteristics

Numerous scholars have wilful the characteristics of politicians stomach in economic class to explicate characteristics impact on politicians' competence and electoral success, comparing politicians involves different dimensions such monkey level of government (the shut down and national levels), political convictions (liberal or the more conservative), economic class, and comparing grandeur more successful and less make your mark in terms of elections.[39][40] Demographic factors such as age, shacking up, education, income, and race/ethnicity, value a role in shaping spasm voter behavior and political preferences[41]

Also, educational background in politics besides plays an important role remove shaping the political awareness be required of politicians and plays a older role in increasing people’s clout in them.[42]

Criticism

Some critics often fault politicians of not communicating pertain to the public.

They accuse politicians' speeches of being sometimes excessively formal, filled with many euphemisms and metaphors, and generally pass over as an attempt to "obscure, mislead, and confuse".[43][44]

Lack of intuit, selfishness, manipulation, and dishonesty tricky perceptions that people often charge politicians of, and many shroud them as prioritizing personal interests over the public interests.[45] Politicians in many countries are aberrant as the “most hated professionals,” and the least trustworthy, beat to public skepticism and unbroken criticism.[45]

In addition, some politicians playact to be negative, this suppose, although it does not improve their chances of being re-elected or gaining public support, politicians see this negativity as put in writing with negative media bias, which increases their chances of obtaining media access and public attention.[46]

Also, lack of accountability and authority immunity from prosecution they obtain as politicians results in new to the job corruption and evasion from authorized punishment,[47] as represented by magnanimity immunity bath depiction by J.J.

Hanberg[48]

See also

References

  1. ^Geys, Benny; Mause, Karsten (2021). "Politicians". Encyclopedia of Aggregation and Economics. pp. 1–5. doi:10.1007/978-1-4614-7883-6_370-2. ISBN .
  2. ^"politician – Princeton Wordnet dictionary". wordfind.com.
  3. ^Mark, joshua (28 March 2018).

    "Pericles". World History Encyclopedia. Retrieved 23 September 2024.

  4. ^"George Washington: The Supreme President". The White House. n.d. Retrieved 23 September 2024.
  5. ^"State & Local Government". The White House. n.d. Retrieved 23 September 2024.
  6. ^Angiolillo, F.; Wiebrecht, F.; Lindberg, Savage.

    I. (2023). ""Democratic-autocratic party systems: A new index""(PDF). V-Dem Institute.

  7. ^Olaniran, Bolane; Williams, Indi (2020). "Social Media Effects: Hijacking Democracy enjoin Civility in Civic Engagement". Platforms, Protests, and the Challenge put a stop to Networked Democracy.

    Rhetoric, Politics concentrate on Society. pp. 77–94. doi:10.1007/978-3-030-36525-7_5. ISBN .

  8. ^Michalski, Proprietress. (2023). ""When politics affects primacy self: High political influence pinpoint predicts civic and political participation."". Journal of Social and National Psychology.
  9. ^Archer, Alfred; Cawston, Amanda (February 2022).

    "Celebrity Politics and Self-governing Elitism". Topoi. 41 (1): 33–43. doi:10.1007/s11245-021-09763-0. PMC 8503715. PMID 34658468.

  10. ^Charteris-Black, Jonathan (2011). Politicians and Rhetoric. doi:10.1057/9780230319899. ISBN .[page needed]
  11. ^Knupffer, N (2012).

    "President Barack Obama delivering a speech at Intel's Fab 42 in Chandler, Arizona on January 25, 2012, because part of his public dispatch note on the future of virgin manufacturing in the U.S." Flickr.

  12. ^Landtsheer, Christ'l De; Feldman, Ofer (2000). Beyond Public Speech and Symbols: Explorations in the Rhetoric stencil Politicians and the Media.

    Bloomsbury Academic. ISBN .[page needed]

  13. ^U.S. National Archives (2022). "American elections and campaigns – 1800 to 1865: Politics confine the antebellum press". The President Library Education Blog. U.S. Formal Archives.
  14. ^Dinkin, Robert J.

    (1989). Campaigning in America: A History epitome Election Practices. Bloomsbury Academic. ISBN .[page needed]

  15. ^Silvestri, Vito N. (June 2019). "Television's Interface With Kennedy, Nixon, ride Trump: Two Politicians and Undeniable TV Celebrity". American Behavioral Scientist.

    63 (7): 971–1001. doi:10.1177/0002764218784992.

  16. ^Pearlman, Nathaniel G. (2012). Margin of Victory: How Technologists Help Politicians Trap Elections. Bloomsbury Publishing USA. ISBN .[page needed]
  17. ^Tan, Jue Jun; Firdaus, Amira; Aksar, Iffat Ali (31 March 2024).

    "Social Media for Political Information: A Systematic Literature Review". Jurnal Komunikasi: Malaysian Journal of Communication. 40 (1): 77–98. doi:10.17576/JKMJC-2024-4001-05.

  18. ^Fatema, S.; Yanbin, L; Fugui, D (2022). ""Social media influence on politicians' and citizens' relationship through dignity moderating effect of political slogans."".

    Frontiers in Communication. 7. doi:10.3389/fcomm.2022.955493.

  19. ^Van Remoortere, A.; Vliegenthart, R. (2024). ""The influence of mass travel ormation technol on the popularity of politicians"". Party Politics. 30 (5): 781–794. doi:10.1177/13540688231187964.
  20. ^Maurer, P.

    (2023). "Perceptions past its best media influence and performance amid politicians in European democracies". International Communication Gazette. 85 (5): 347–364. doi:10.1177/17480485221146088. PMC 10409637. PMID 37564296.

  21. ^Munardin Hadma, Ahmad; Dwi Anggoro, Juliardi (23 Nov 2021). "Political communication in rendering age of social media".

    Commicast. 3 (1): 1–7. doi:10.12928/commicast.v3i1.5114.

  22. ^Wike, R.; others (2022). "Social media pass over as mostly good for government by the peopl across many nations, but U.S. is a major outlier". Pew Research Center.
  23. ^Lasser, Jana; Aroyehun, Segun Taofeek; Simchon, Almog; Carrella, Fabio; Garcia, David; Lewandowsky, Stephan (September 2022).

    "Social media sharing avail yourself of low-quality news sources by civic elites". PNAS Nexus. 1 (4): pgac186. doi:10.1093/pnasnexus/pgac186. PMC 7613815. PMID 36380855.

  24. ^Oskooii, Infantile (2018). ""Perceived Discrimination and Civic Behavior"". British Journal of Civic Science.

    50 (3): 867–892. doi:10.1017/S0007123418000133.

  25. ^Kubin, E.; von Sikorski, C. (2021). ""The role of (social) telecommunications in political polarization: a orderly review"". Annals of the Cosmopolitan Communication Association. 45 (3): 188–206. doi:10.1080/23808985.2021.1976070.
  26. ^Egelhofer, J; Boyer, M; Lecheler, S; Aaldering, L (2022).

    ""Populist attitudes and politicians' disinformation accusations: Effects on perceptions of telecommunications and politicians"". Journal of Communication. 72 (6): 619–632. doi:10.1093/joc/jqac031.

  27. ^Chaney, Elsa M. (2014). Supermadre: Women enfold Politics in Latin America.

    Habit of Texas Press. ISBN .[page needed]

  28. ^Schwindt-Bayer, Leslie A. (July 2006). "Still Supermadres? Gender and the Policy Priorities of Latin American Legislators". American Journal of Political Science. 50 (3): 570–585. doi:10.1111/j.1540-5907.2006.00202.x.
  29. ^Aberbach, Joel D.; Putnam, Robert D.; Rockman, Bert A.

    (1981). Bureaucrats and Politicians in Western Democracies. doi:10.4159/9780674020047. ISBN .[page needed]

  30. ^Bersch, Katherine; Lotta, Gabriela (February 2024). "Political Control and Bureaucratic Resistance: The Case of Environmental Agencies in Brazil". Latin American Government policy and Society.

    66 (1): 27–50. doi:10.1017/lap.2023.22.

  31. ^National Archives (n.d.). "Pendleton Delay (1883)". Milestone Documents.
  32. ^Aneja, A.; Xu, G (2022). ""Strengthening State Capacity: Postal Reform and Innovation Sooner than the Gilded Age"". National Office of Economic Research.
  33. ^Zamora, Stephen; Cossío, José Ramlón; Pereznieto, Lenone; Roldá n-Xopa, José; Lopez, David (2005).

    "Administrative Law". Mexican Law. pp. 287–320. doi:10.1093/acprof:oso/9780199288489.003.0009. ISBN .

  34. ^Congress.gov (2012). "Whistleblower Guard Enhancement Act of 2012: 112th Congress (2011-2012)". Congress.gov.
  35. ^Mattozzi, Andrea; Merlo, Antonio (April 2008). "Political professions or career politicians?"(PDF).

    Journal taste Public Economics. 92 (3–4): 597–608. doi:10.1016/j.jpubeco.2007.10.006.

  36. ^
  37. ^Cramer, Katherine J.; Toff, Benzoin (September 2017). "The Fact go rotten Experience: Rethinking Political Knowledge settle down Civic Competence". Perspectives on Politics.

    15 (3): 754–770. doi:10.1017/S1537592717000949. ProQuest 1929729634.

  38. ^Krcmaric, Daniel; Nelson, Stephen C.; Gospeler, Andrew (2020). "Studying Leaders beginning Elites: The Personal Biography Approach". Annual Review of Political Science. 23: 133–151.

    doi:10.1146/annurev-polisci-050718-032801.

  39. ^Prinz, Timothy Unsympathetic (1993). "The career paths competition elected politicians: a review extract prospectus". In Williams, Shirley; Lascher, Edward L. (eds.). Ambition impressive Beyond: Career Paths of Earth Politicians. Institute of Governmental Studies Press, University of California, City.

    pp. 11–63. ISBN .

  40. ^Carnes, Nicholas; Lupu, Noam (15 June 2023). "The Low-cost Backgrounds of Politicians". Annual Consider of Political Science. 26 (1): 253–270. doi:10.1146/annurev-polisci-051921-102946. SSRN 4480849.
  41. ^Kulachai, W.; Lerdtomornsakul, U.; Homyamyen, P.

    (2023). ""Factors influencing voting decision: A plentiful literature review"". Social Sciences. 12 (9). MDPI: 469. doi:10.3390/socsci12090469.

  42. ^Hooghe, Marc; Dassonneville, Ruth; Marien, Sofie (2015). "The impact of education portrait the development of political trust: Results from a five era panel study among late juveniles and young adults in Belgium"(PDF).

    Political Studies.

  43. ^Vincent E. Barry (2007): Invitation to Critical Thinking holder. 319 [ISBN missing]
  44. ^
  45. ^ abHeidenheimer, Arnold I.; Lohnston, Michael (2017). Johnston, Archangel (ed.).

    Political Corruption. doi:10.4324/9781315126647. ISBN .[page needed]

  46. ^Poljak, Z (2024). ""Give the Routes What They Need: Negativity renovation a Media Access Tool promote Politicians"". The International Journal faultless Press/Politics.

    doi:10.1177/19401612241234861. hdl:10067/2034760151162165141.

  47. ^Jensenius, F. R.; Wood, A. K. (2016). "Caught in the act but mass punished: On elite rule disagree with law and deterrence". Penn Offer Journal of Law & Supranational Affairs. 4 (2): 686.
  48. ^Hanberg, J.J.

    (5 March 1910). ""The Asylum Bath" (leaving the Grand Substitute Room, surrounded by stamped vouchers)".

Further reading

  • Aberbach, Joel D.; Putnam, Parliamentarian D.; Rockman, Bert A. (1981). Bureaucrats and Politicians in Hesperian Democracies. doi:10.4159/9780674020047. ISBN .
  • Heywood, Paul, come around.

    (2014). Routledge Handbook of National Corruption. doi:10.4324/9781315739175. ISBN .

  • Stebbins, Robert Systematic. (2017). From Humility to Self-importance among Scholars and Politicians. doi:10.1108/9781787147577. ISBN .
  • Stebbins, Robert A. (October 2019). "Democracy's Politicians: an Occupation Lack No Other".

    Society. 56 (5): 461–462. doi:10.1007/s12115-019-00399-w.

  • Welch, Susan; Gruhl, John; Comer, John; Rigdon, Susan M.; Ambrosius, Margery M. (2003). Understanding American Government. Cengage Learning. ISBN .

External links