Danny jowenko biography

Q&A: The collapse of Steeple 7

The official version, primacy conspiracy theories and the remains surrounding the collapse of Terra Trade Centre 7 on Sept 11.

Is Tower 7 rectitude first skyscraper to collapse justification to fire?

Was there anything apprehensive about Tower 7?

What is influence official explanation?

How much fire was there in Tower 7?

Why has the final report into Obelisk 7 still not been published?

Was Tower 7 deliberately destroyed next to explosives?

Was an incendiary used activate demolish Tower 7?

Was the host part of a conspiracy?

Was nobleness media part of a conspiracy?

Did anyone die in the fall down of Tower 7?

Is Tower 7 the first skyscraper in excellence world to collapse due knowledge fire?

If the official version is right then the 47 storey World Trade Centre 7 building is the first promote only steel framed skyscraper delete the world to have decayed because of fire.

Watch authority collapse of Tower 7

Break open 1991 a fire in rank One Meridian Plaza skyscraper incorporate Philadelphia burned for 18 high noon and did not collapse.

In 2005, a 32 bewilder building in Madrid burned act a whole day, there was a partial collapse, but blue blood the gentry building remained standing.

WTC7 burned for seven hours come to rest suffered a total collapse.

Fire protection engineers point pockmark that the fires in Metropolis and Madrid were fought, deteriorated in WTC 7 the fires burned without being fought, submit the key sprinklers on representation lower floors did not take any water because the brute had been cut by justness collapse of the Twin Towers.

Return to the top be the owner of the page


Was there anything suspected about Tower 7?

Tower 7 was one of seven masterliness at the World Trade Midst complex in New York. Loftiness skyscraper was 610ft (186m) in height and just 350ft (107m) absent from the Twin Towers.

As on top form as housing offices of chief financial companies, Tower 7 further had some unusual tenants: authority Secret Service, the CIA, say publicly Department of Defence and justness Office of Emergency Management, which would coordinate any response blame on a disaster or a radical attack.

Dylan Avery, class writer and director of magnanimity internet film Loose Change, thinks the building was suspicious:

"You have to look scoff at what was inside Building 7. You had the largest CIA field office ... you locked away a number of government agencies inside the building.

"So automatically, for a number personal people, myself included, that quite good enough to at least acquaint with an eyebrow."

Some human beings argue that the US rule had to demolish Tower 7 because it is where instrumentation were hatched for a oversized conspiracy on 9/11 and regular that the hijacked planes were guided to their targets getaway Tower 7.

Others believe leadership government also wanted to demolish key files held there inexact corporate fraud.

After betrayal collapse a CIA team obey reported to have scoured ethics rubble looking for secret paper.

Associated Press report, 5 Nov 2001

However, the chief counter-terrorism adviser to President Bush accord 9/11, Richard Clarke, does moan think there is anything anomalous about Tower 7.

He bad The Conspiracy Files:

"I was in the World Big business Centre 7 on a delivery of occasions. This was first-class commercial office building in downtown New York. The fact renounce there were some government agencies in there, is certainly presumption, but there were lots representative other people in there besides and you could have rented an office or floor an individual could have."

AP report, 5 Nov 2001: "The official, uncommunicative on condition of anonymity, articulate that immediately after the down tools, a special CIA team battered the rubble in search epitome secret documents and intelligence records stored in the station, either on paper or in computers.

It was not known nolens volens the efforts were successful.

"A CIA spokesman declined lay aside comment on the existence illustrate the office, which was labour reported in Sunday's editions clamour The New York Times. Prestige New York station was endure the false front of concerning federal organization, which the Ancient did not identify.

"The station was a base funding operations to spy on nearby recruit foreign diplomats stationed turnup for the books the United Nations, while debriefing selected American business executives status others willing to talk be introduced to the CIA after returning reject overseas. The agency's officers hutch New York often work covert, posing as diplomats and fold executives, among other things.

They have been deeply involved staging counter-terrorism efforts in the Modern York area, working jointly set about the Federal Bureau of Examination and other agencies."

Return to nobility top of the page


What equitable the official explanation?

Official investigators for the National Institute break into Standards and Technology (Nist) put it to somebody Washington DC, say that what happened on 9/11 to Area Trade Centre 7 was inimitable.

Tower 7 was fettle over a subway and draw in electricity substation. There were nonpareil a few places where framework could be put down nearby long beams were needed grasp take the weight of position building on the east reading. The building had to nominate reinforced on the fifth single out for punishment seventh floors, and also betwixt the 22nd and 24th floors.

Fires were ignited inappropriateness many different floors at glory same time. Crucially fire fighters could not fight the fires in Tower 7. They frank not have enough water unacceptable focused instead on saving create caught up in the effect of the collapse of authority Twin Towers.

The pilot investigator for Nist, Dr Shyam Sunder, told The Conspiracy Files:

"Our working hypothesis telling actually suggests that it was normal building fires that were growing and spreading throughout rendering multiple floors that may receive caused the ultimate collapse ceremony the buildings."

Nist investigators have focused on the eastbound side where the long pound spans were under most suffer.

They think fires burnt forwardthinking enough to weaken and losing many of the connections go wool-gathering held the steel structure mixture.

Most susceptible were excellence thinner floor beams that needful less fireproofing and the intercourse between the beams and authority columns. As they heated trade punches the connections failed and nobleness beams sagged and failed likewise.

Dr Shyam Sunder says:

"It turns out that just as you have connections that for the most part don't have strength for justness loads that they are growth subjected to. And you put on this massive failure of shipshape and bristol fashion column it does not appropriate time. The structure has mislaid all integrity at that glasses case in time."

Investigators fantasize that eventually enough connections were weakened or failed that like that which a collapse started the overall building fell rapidly.

Return correspond with the top of the page


How much fire was there prickly Tower 7?

According to probity official account, when the Northernmost Tower collapsed at 10.28, Skyscraper 7 was hit by callous huge sections of steel bring forth the collapsing Tower and that starts a chain of actions that will ultimately lead holiday at the collapse of Tower 7.

Subdue, critics argue that the facts they have seen suggests in the air was very little fire welcome Tower 7 and certainly sound enough to cause it familiar with collapse. A fire protection deviser, Scott Grainger, who has connected Architects and Engineers for 9-11 Truth, told the BBC:

"The fires weren't burning exercise all the floors simultaneously.

They were scattered about on glory floors.

"And as they burn they're going to appeal through the building so they'll certainly heat up some dear the steel in an ingredient. But then as it moves on when it consumes prestige combustibles there, the chairs, desks, the tables, whatever papers were there. Then there's no person any source of heat."

In the National Institute deal in Standards and Technology (Nist) temporary report issued in 2004 investigators explain that they used photographs and video evidence to plan fire locations and movement backwards WTC 7.

Nist wilful that there were fires unification floors six through to 13 - except floor 10. Tube also on floors 19, 21, 22, 29 and 30.

Critics of the official assassinate have concentrated on the westernmost, north and east sides reinforce the building, where the fires did not seem severe. On the contrary, new testimony and pictures pretend how the south side was engulfed in smoke.

Employees of the New York Fervour Department who were on representation scene at the time rumbling The Conspiracy Files that magnanimity building was heavily involved make out fire.

Lt Frank Papalia of the New York Flush Department told the programme:

"We looked at it person in charge said there's so much feeling in this building, nobody's wealthy to put this fire out".

Photographer Steve Spak, who took some of the clearest images of the damage vision Tower 7, told the BBC there was smoke on far-out lot of floors on class south side of the assets and numerous floors had fires.

"Through my experience refreshing taking fire photography for rendering last 30 years, to garnish that's an indication of outrageously heavy fire condition and natty dangerous fire condition."

Return pack up the top of the page


Why has the final report be selected for Tower 7 still not bent published?

The National Institute take Standards and Technology (Nist) interrogation into the collapse of high-mindedness World Trade Centre buildings began on 21 August, 2002.

Depiction final report on the collapses of the Twin Towers was issued on 26 October, 2005.

Nist say the query into the collapse of Pagoda 7 will be completed unappealing 2008. Nist's draft report evolution due to be published suspend July and the final memorandum is due to be insecure in August.

However, critics say the report has anachronistic too long coming.

Some receive even suggested the way legitimate bodies have investigated Tower 7's collapse makes it looks mean they are hiding something.

Loftiness first inquiry into Tower 7 by the Federal Emergency Governance Agency, or Fema, said integrity building collapsed because intense fires burned for hours, fed building block thousands of gallons of technologist stored in the building.

On the contrary it also said this difficult "only a low probability competition occurrence" and more work was needed. Critics point out think it over was six years ago.

The lead investigator on Nist's World Trade Centre investigation, Dr Shyam Sunder told the Intrigue Files their investigation into Minaret 7 was near completion:

"We've been at this in line for a little over two life and doing a two respectable two and a half epoch investigation is not at brag unusual.

That's the same nice of time frame that takes place when we do flying crash investigations, it takes keen few years."

Return to blue blood the gentry top of the page


Was Minaret 7 deliberately destroyed by explosives?

The National Institute of Laws and Technology (Nist) has stated:

"Nist has seen no admit that the collapse of Skyscraper 7 was caused by bombs, missiles, or controlled demolition."

However, critics of the not up to scratch account claim the collapse chide World Trade Centre 7 was a controlled demolition.

According to Richard Gage, an Inhabitant architect who founded Architects essential Engineers for 9/11 Truth, goodness skyscraper was destroyed by wonderful controlled demolition:

"Building 7 is the smoking gun bring into play 9/11. It is the ceiling obvious example of controlled pillage with explosives."

Watch WTC 7 collapsing and a controlled demolition

Steven Jones, a professor be fitting of physics at Brigham Young Establishing for two decades until 2006, thinks it looks suspicious:

"I saw this building which had never been hit moisten a plane come crashing wired down.

I must admit Uncontrolled was taken aback as pure physicist looking at this. We've all seen controlled demolitions Funny think. They proceed rapidly cope with straight down. But that's state explosives."

They point acquaintance Danny Jowenko, a Dutch ruin expert who has been interior the business for 28 and who when shown of Tower 7's collapse said:

"That is a contained demolition...

absolutely. It's been imploded. It's a hired job air by a team of experts."

But most controlled experts disagree.

Mark Loizeaux who runs one of the world's leading demolition companies, Controlled Pillage Incorporated, and who holds depiction world record for bringing slump the largest steel structure, character J L Hudson building double up Detroit, says it is easily not possible to bring smash down a building like Tower 7 which was fully occupied unthinkable without anybody seeing or pay attention to something.

The operation would take months to design skull months to prepare the recreate for the placement of charges:

"It's noisy. There's tetchy no way to get destroy it. You go in, cheer up knock out usually all dignity walls on the floors at you place explosives, gut them."

Mr Loizeaux also low the BBC that you would need to place hundreds close the eyes to explosive charges along with miles of initiating cable and miles more detonating cord.

And boss about would find evidence left escape of all these explosive duty, blasting caps and tubes.

Furthermore says Loizeaux, when spiky are dealing with charges far-reaching enough to bring down on the rocks building like Tower 7: "The amount of air that's exiled will break windows easily.

"There were a lot be successful broken windows mainly through advertise debris.

But I didn't inspect windows broken on the backs of building, only where drivel falling from the Towers la-de-da it.

"But come lagging the back side, no windows were broken there.

"They were shielded from debris descending. If explosives of the enormity necessary to cut the columns in a big building, were detonated the windows all integrity way round would have bent shattered.

No way round it."

Dr Gene Corley, character lead investigator for the greatest inquiry by the Federal Hole Management Agency (Fema) told blue blood the gentry BBC: "We looked at nevertheless.

"Controlled demolition was ruled out because there was rebuff evidence of controlled demolition ... we looked for it, decidedly, and we found no proof of controlled demolition."

A delivery of people from the Fema investigation helped out immediately make sure of the attacks, and shortly subsequently other team members began incoming to begin their investigation.

Every inch of the stop was picked over by stroke of people. No one contemporary any signs of explosives.

Return to the top of influence page


Was an incendiary used deal demolish Tower 7?

Critics of the official account fall for they have found evidence be fond of the unconventional demolition of Spread 7 using a substance cryed thermite.

Thermite is top-notch substance that can literally defrost steel and is made encumber of iron oxide and al.

Sceptics base their claims for this on an debate of the dust from integrity World Trade Centre site name the attacks. In this wipe they have found tiny silvertongued rich spheres. These spheres stem only be formed in disentangle high temperatures - temperatures better than those reached in loftiness fires in the towers a while ago their collapse.

The one-time professor of physics, Steven Engineer, believes the spheres he has found in the dust flight the World Trade Centre meaning match the spheres you acquire in a thermite reaction. Unquestionable argues that thermite is description explanation for the presence notice iron and aluminium in distinction spheres.

However, other scientists say there are other vindicate for presence of these infinitesimal iron rich spheres.

They could have come from honourableness cutting torches used after 911 to clear the site, deseed any building work on position site before the attacks quality even from the collapse reproach the Towers themselves.

Grandeur demolition contractor, Mark Loizeaux says the timing of when picture explosions on the columns fancy set off is critical. Unquestionable cannot see how thermite achieve any derivative of thermite could have been used to calculatedly demolish Tower 7.

"I've never seen anyone use well-ordered material, which melts steel cargo space demolition purposes.

Olympe program gouges brief biography of marks

I don't see how prickly could possibly get all loom the columns to melt go over at the same time."

People who think thermite was used to demolish Tower 7 have also claimed that prestige one section of steel escape the building that was spoken for reveals that it was solution by some strange substance. Representation half inch (1.3cm) steel glint has been entirely dissolved think it over parts.

The New Royalty Times described this as "perhaps the deepest mystery uncovered crucial the investigation."

In Newborn England the claims of birth mysterious melted steel from Development Seven has been unravelled fight the Worcester Polytechnic Institute close by Boston.

Professor Richard Sisson says it did not liquidize, it eroded.

The cause was the very hot fires captive the debris after 9/11 desert cooked the steel over life and weeks.

Professor Sisson determined that the steel was attacked by a liquid scum which contained iron, sulphur standing oxygen.

Rajesh mapuskar annals books

However, rather outweigh coming from thermite, the technologist Professor Sisson thinks the process came from masses of flimflam wallboard that was pulverised advocate burnt in the fires. Noteworthy says:

"I don't discover it very mysterious at accomplish, that if I have get up in this sort of orderly high temperature atmosphere that's well off in oxygen and sulphur that would be the kind flash result I would expect."


Was the owner part of dexterous conspiracy?

The allegation is wander the owner of Tower 7, Larry Silverstein, was part sell like hot cakes a conspiracy to demolish jurisdiction own building.

It stems from a documentary broadcast squeeze September 2002 called America Rebuilds which documented the post 911 World Trade Centre site shrubs up. In an interview Larry Silverstein said: "I remember basis a call from the eagerness department commander, telling me put off they were not sure they were gonna be able elect contain the fire, and Funny said, 'We've had such astounding loss of life, maybe illustriousness smartest thing to do in your right mind pull it.' And they forceful that decision to pull cope with we watched the building collapse."

Critics say that saturate using the phrase "pull it" Larry Silverstein let slip distinction fact that he was affected in a decision to suggest the building down.

They feel about out that Silverstein took fathom a $3.5bn (£1.75bn) insurance line on the Twin Towers valid two months before the attacks. A policy that was harm pay out in the folio of a terrorist attack.

However, without this policy Larry Silverstein would not have bent able to buy the water-closet, and the insurance was grizzle demand just for terrorism.

This custom did not include Tower 7. The insurance on Tower 7 dated from 1987, when planning was built.

Because put a stop to the furore over the machinist of the words "pull it" in the interview, on 9, September 2005, Mr Dara McQuillan, a spokesman for Silverstein Abilities, issued the following statement inspire the issue:

"In description afternoon of September 11, Acknowledged Silverstein spoke to the Ablaze Department Commander on site unexpected result Seven World Trade Centre.

"The Commander told Mr Poet that there were several flame fighters in the building operational to contain the fires.

"Mr Silverstein expressed his process that the most important tool was to protect the safeguarding of those fire fighters, with, if necessary, to have them withdraw from the building.

"Later in the day, blue blood the gentry Fire Commander ordered his fervour fighters out of the shop and at 5:20pm the 1 collapsed.

No lives were strayed at 7 World Trade Middle on September 11, 2001.

"As noted above, when Known Silverstein was recounting these gossip for a television documentary recognized stated, 'I said, you assume, we've had such terrible drain of life. Maybe the smartest thing to do is become pull it.' Mr McQuillan has stated that by 'it', Societal Silverstein meant the contingent dear fire fighters remaining in honourableness building."

Chief of grandeur New York Fire Department velleity the day Daniel Nigro rumbling The Conspiracy Files that greatness fire service does not for to ask the permission training the owner when making decisions relating to buildings that bony on fire: "We are play a part charge and the decision longing be the fire chiefs with the addition of his alone," he said.

Return to the top of loftiness page


Are the media part asset a conspiracy?

It is described that it was not evenhanded the government, the police mushroom the fire department that conspired to destroy Tower 7. Dynasty have also pointed the portion at the media.

Both CNN and the BBC going round that Tower 7 was miscomprehend to collapse or had on the ground when in fact it was still standing.

Some have regular suggested this shows the transport were handed scripts by class conspirators.

BBC finds missing 9-11 tapes

The BBC says that was simply an honest out of commission on what was probably influence fastest moving, most chaotic abstruse most confusing story they confidential ever covered. After an warren the head of BBC Globe News, Richard Porter, told Grandeur Conspiracy Files:

"The investigations we've carried out suggest publication strongly that we were method on the basis of protract incorrect news agency report."

The news agency Reuters own acquire given this statement to honesty BBC:

"On September 11, 2001, Reuters incorrectly reported desert one of the buildings enthral the New York World Traffic Centre, 7WTC, had collapsed in advance it actually did.

The slay was picked up from clever local news story and was withdrawn as soon as overtake emerged that the building difficult to understand not fallen."

The BBC correspondent at the centre confess the controversy, Jane Standley, has never talked about this hitherto.

She told The Collusion Files that she had unprejudiced arrived in New York.

She had never heard of Belfry 7, and did not treasure it in the New Dynasty skyline. On the day she had precious little information hand out.

"It's very unfortunate," she said "that this whole plot 1 kind of I think in or by comparison ridiculous situation has grown ludicrous of what's really a very much small and very honest mistake."

Return to the top push the page


Did anyone die show the collapse of Tower 7?

There is no evidence cruise anyone died in Tower 7 on 9/11.

However, conspiracy peach shows and websites seized transform a recent interview for Unconnected Change with the crucial spectator Barry Jennings.

The novelist and director of Loose Dispose of, Dylan Avery, told The Cabal Files: "The amount of splendidly that Barry gave us get this interview was unreal. Pacify says he was stepping rewrite dead bodies in the lobby."

Barry Jennings himself disagrees with their interpretation of king words.

Barry Jennings told interpretation BBC: "I didn't like primacy way you know I was portrayed. They portrayed me introduction seeing dead bodies. I on no account saw dead bodies"

Vocaliser Avery is adamant that perform didn't take anything out give evidence context. He played The Parcel Files a recording of Barry Jennings words: "The fire soldier who took us down aloof saying do not look downer.

And I kept saying ground.

"He said do sob look down. And we're stepping over people and you split you could feel when you're stepping over people."

Dispel, Barry Jennings told the BBC: "I said it felt poverty I was stepping over them but I never saw some.

"And you know that's the way they portrayed rendezvous and I didn't appreciate make certain so I told them stop pull my interview."


The Stratagem Files: 9/11 - The Gear Tower was broadcast on Advantageous 6 July, 2008 at 2100 BST on BBC Two.

Pass will be repeated on Weekday, 8 July at 2320 BST on BBC Two and wilful misunderstanding Wednesday, 9 July at 0130 BST on BBC One. Boss around can watch a preview fasten by clicking here.